א׳ מרחשון ה׳תשפ״ז | October 12, 2026
Since When Was Chassidus Meant to Be Self-Serving? — Part II
“The question is not about minimizing avodah ch”v. The Rebbeim emphasized again and again that Chassidus must affect the way a person serves Hashem. The question is whether that effect is the ultimate reason for the learning, or whether it is the natural outcome of something deeper.”
By Rabbi Yosef Y. Cohen
After my recent article, I received quite a bit of feedback, both publicly and privately. Much of the discussion focused on one particular point.
Interestingly, the disagreement was not about the essence of Chassidus itself. The essence of Chassidus is not avodah. Chassidus is Torah. It is the revelation of פנימיות התורה, the deepest dimension of Torah. That was not really the point of contention.
The discussion was about a different question: Why do we study Chassidus?
The argument was made that even if Chassidus itself is not avodah, the reason we study it is in order that it should transform our avodah. We study Chassidus so that it should change the way we think, the way we daven, the way we relate to Hashem, the way we refine our middos, and the way we live as Yidden.
Many sources were brought to support this idea, especially from the Rebbeim, emphasizing the tangible results that should come from learning Chassidus. And those sources were absolutely accurate: Chassidus is meant to change a person.
But the question is: Is that the ultimate level of learning Chassidus? Or is that one level—the way Chassidus affects our avodah—while there is a deeper level of why we learn?
The question is not about minimizing avodah ch”v. The Rebbeim emphasized again and again that Chassidus must affect the way a person serves Hashem. The question is whether that effect is the ultimate reason for the learning, or whether it is the natural outcome of something deeper.
The Rebbe himself addressed this point in a remarkable way.
At the Yud-Tes Kislev farbrengen of 5723, after speaking about the need to strengthen לימוד החסידות, the Rebbe said:
“כוונתי היא בפשטות ביותר: יש להוסיף בשקידה והתמדה בלימוד החסידות. הלימוד יבוא במילא לידי מעשה, אבל דיבורי עתה – ופי ולבי שוין: התמדה ושקידה בלימוד החסידות.”
“My intention is very simple: We need to increase our diligence and perseverance in learning Chassidus. The learning will automatically lead to action. But what I am speaking about now—and ‘my mouth and my heart are the same’—is simply diligence and perseverance in learning Chassidus.”
Why did the Rebbe add “ופי ולבי שוין”?
Because someone could misunderstand the Rebbe’s words. Someone could think: The Rebbe wants us to learn Chassidus because he knows it will change us. The real agenda behind the learning is that it should improve our avodah.
The Rebbe says: No. “ופי ולבי שוין” – my words mean exactly what they say. I want you to learn Chassidus.
Yes, “הלימוד יבוא במילא לידי מעשה.” The learning will automatically lead to action. But that is not a hidden purpose behind my request. The learning itself is the point.
And there is an even more explicit source for this distinction.
In the Rebbe’s maamar “תורה צוה” of 5723, the Rebbe discusses the statement of Chazal, “לעולם יעסוק אדם בתורה ומצוות שלא לשמה, שמתוך שלא לשמה בא לשמה.”
At the beginning of a person’s avodah, the Rebbe explains, his learning Torah is “אדעתא דנפשי׳”—in order to refine and purify himself: “בכדי לברר ולזכך את נפשו.”
That is a real and necessary level of Torah learning. But it is nevertheless called “שלא לשמה.”
And where does the person ultimately arrive? “ועי”ז בא אח”כ לעסק התורה לשמה, לשם התורה עצמה.” He eventually reaches learning Torah “for the sake of the Torah itself” – a level that is “שלמעלה מענין הבירורים.”
And then the Rebbe makes the point even more remarkable:
“ויש לומר, דשני ענינים אלה הם גליא דתורה ופנימיות התורה.” There is a level of learning Torah in order to refine oneself, and there is a higher level of learning “לשם התורה עצמה.”
The first is explicitly described as שלא לשמה. The second is Torah for Torah’s own sake.
Yes, learning Chassidus in order to improve our avodah is real. It is important. It is even a necessary stage.
But if that is the reason I am learning – because of what the learning will do for me – then, in the Rebbe’s terminology, I am still in the category of “אדעתא דנפשי׳.”
The deeper level is when I learn Chassidus because it is Torah. Not because of what it will do. Not because of what it will produce. “לשם התורה עצמה.”
Reb Yoel Kahn used to drive this point home. He would ask: Do you learn that two plus two equals four because you want it to change you? Of course not. You learn it because it is true.
The same is true of אחדות ה’. The fact that Hashem is One is not merely a tool to make us better people. It is a truth that a Jew needs to know. Our minds should be occupied with the truth of Torah because it is Torah – not only because of what it will do to us.
And this is also where the Rebbe’s discussion in “ואלה המשפטים” of 5714 comes in.
There, the Rebbe describes the various levels of שלא לשמה. Even learning Torah in order to know what to do – “לידע את המעשה אשר יעשון” – is still called שלא לשמה, because the Torah is being learned as a means to something else.
In the sicha of that same Shabbos, the Rebbe takes the idea further, describing how a person can begin with a subtle form of שלא לשמה and gradually descend, step by step, until eventually losing his connection to Yiddishkeit altogether.
I know of a person whom the Rebbe spoke to privately about this very subject. The Rebbe warned him about this downward progression. Tragically, that person later went through those stages himself, until he reached the point described by the Rebbe—and ultimately returned.
If this can happen with Torah generally, what happens when we take Chassidus, the פנימיות התורה, and turn it into spiritual therapy?
At first it sounds completely legitimate: I learn Chassidus to become a better person. Then I learn it because it helps my davening. Then because it gives me inspiration. Then because it helps me deal with my problems. And eventually Chassidus itself becomes nothing more than therapy.
And if the therapy stops working? I don’t want to finish that sentence.
This is why there are really two dimensions to Chassidus.
On one level, Chassidus is the greatest tool we have for avodah. It gives us the understanding and the strength to daven differently, recognize Hashem, refine our middos, and overcome the yetzer hara.
But there is another level. Chassidus is פנימיות התורה. It’s not a method or spiritual technique. It is Torah itself.
And the Rebbe explains in many places that the revelation of פנימיות התורה is also preparation for the coming of Moshiach, when the deepest dimension of Torah will be revealed in its fullness.
This is where the famous mashal of the precious stone from the King’s crown becomes so powerful.
The King’s son is seriously ill. The only possible cure is to take the most precious stone from the King’s crown, crush it, and mix it into a medicine. Perhaps one drop will enter the child’s mouth and save his life.
The mashal teaches us that פנימיות התורה was brought down and revealed because we need it. It gives life to the Jewish people. It strengthens our avodah and enables us to overcome spiritual challenges.
But the stone has another dimension. The stone is not just a medicine; it’s a jewel in the King’s crown. Its value is not only in what it can accomplish when it is used; its value is that it is a precious part of the King’s crown.
And that is the deeper point about Chassidus.
Yes, Chassidus saves us. Chassidus transforms our avodah and is meant to change the way we live. But its ultimate value is not only in what it does for us. Its ultimate value is that it is פנימיות התורה itself.
There is an old mashal told by the mashpia Reb Chaim Shaul Bruk a”h: Using Chassidus merely to get rid of our spiritual problems is like using a golden broom to sweep the floor. A broom is useful, but gold is not meant to be used as a broom.
The issue is not that the broom does not work. The issue is that we have taken something incomparably more valuable and reduced it to a tool.
Chassidus should change our avodah. But Chassidus is not merely about our avodah.
Don’t confuse what Chassidus does with what Chassidus is.
I’m sorry to say but there’s a major point being missed by this article.
People are frustrated because they don’t see at all what you’re writing.
Today in the community where I live, you have people learning a lot of chassidus that don’t have good middos and you have those not learning that have exceptional middos.
And every person has gone through their own life meeting many smart, intelligent people that learn a lot of chassidus but it doesn’t add up at all in their behavior and sometimes it’s actually the opposite the more they learn the less common sense and sensitivity they have.
It could be that these people would’ve been mass murderers because they learn chassidus their evil inclination has now been reduced to just a mean heartless teacher. I don’t know
To paint the picture that all those that learn to have rosey lives, and automatically things become perfect, is a bit naïve.
The main thing is the inner work that comes after Learning and MOST PEOPLE DONT DO IT. Because it’s HARD.
And this is where the conversation starts with applying what we learn and having a way to grow in what we learn and not just learning to learn.
Let’s be a little humble.
You raise a point about people who learn Chassidus and don’t have good behavior ethic.
This complaint has been voiced from time immemorial. It’s been voiced against religious Jews. It’s voiced against those who spend their life immersed in Torah. And now the complaint is raised against those immersed in Chassidus.
But these are two separate topics. Of course, one has to work on improving their character trait. But that is not the ultimate purpose of the study of Chssidus.
Because they are religious Jews, whose character traits are less than desirable, does that mean they should stop practicing religion? No, it means they should start working on improving their character. Same here.
No one is saying not to learn chassidus. And no one is repeating words of anti semites.
As a proud member of the Chabad team we can do better and not to be satisfied at all with learning alone.
And there is destruction going on by stopping by learning and not applying it.
And I’m not Gd forbid saying to stop but it just brings out the importance of application.
I had a student at my house who after becoming a Lubavitcher left because of the behavior of the hanholo in his yeshiva.
He said “I don’t want to be like that person that’s not what I came for”
Any interaction we have with others will be impactful if we work on ourselves to internalize the messages and outlook of chassidus and give from our own heart and not just to share some holy abstract idea.
Can you explain what’s the difference between עובדים and משכלים according to your article.
The difference is that the עובדים focused more on what Chassidus should do to the person, while the משכילים focused more on understanding Chassidus itself.
Both were interested in avodah. The difference was where the emphasis lay: the עובד was primarily concerned with how the understanding would affect his avodah, while the משכיל was more absorbed in the intellectual understanding itself.
Learning in order to improve one’s avodah is certainly better than learning merely as an intellectual pursuit. Yet even this is not the ultimate purpose, since one is still learning for the sake of what it will accomplish for oneself. The ultimate is to learn because it is Hashem’s Torah, because Chassidus reveals Elokus. One is not learning merely to become a better oved; one learns because this is the truth of Elokus, and one’s avodah follows naturally from that.
Which one did the Rabbim say is a higher level or in better words is closer to the כוונה?
Limud is rotzon Hashem.
Maaseh is rotzon Hashem.
And one without the other is nice, but not the way it’s supposed to be.
Therefore: I’m not learning because it inspires me or even changes me; I’m learning because that’s what Hashem wants.
And by the exact same token, I am searching for the bechein and hora’ah lemaaseh in everything I learn not because it makes me feel good or because it fixes my problems, but because that’s what Hashem wants. Dirah betachtcnim means the lowest and most physical of kochos, in maaseh.
The difference between what I wrote, and what you seem to be saying in this article is that you seem to be coming from a perspective that most people have a very hard time relating to. It’s extremely abstract. In my opinion, this recalibration and focus on what Hashem wants solves the issue: Sure, use aspects of Chassidus to help you with life – but do so because that’s Rotzon Hashem, not because you want self-actualization! Refine yourself because מפני זה ירדה הנשמה למטה.
The reality is we do not have the monopoly on מדות טובות. In fact, I would argue that this is an area that we are severely lacking in our Chabad community, myself included.
We are also majorly lacking in areas of chesed to one another, where other communities have this down to a science.
Chabad kids are not known for their stellar derech Eretz, when we even argue at the opposite is true.
In the litvish world, kids see that adults respect the rov, in Chabad they hear the adults disrespect the rov.
I’m not sure if chassidus effects our midos, maybe we’re learning the wrong mamer.