You can see clearly that the picture is cut out. It looks like that the border of the picture was originally on a square paper later it was cut out with part of the writing on the back.

BH

Whatever, I am not going to argue to the lighting int he pictures (I certainly disagree), but in regards to the Babies hair, I need to point out that had the hair been lighter hair, then it would have been a lot less noticeable. The very fact that it is noticeable is a proof in how dark it is.

the lighting is different in the 2 pictures, and in the later confirmed picture(where the lighting is darker) you can tell clearly that the rebbetzins hair is much lighter than her older sisters so it makes a lot of sense that it looks darker in the later picture.and in the first picture when she is a baby there is no way to tell the hair color,there is barely any hair

nor is this the 1st item of “Rebbe’s family memorabilia” that he has ‘produced’ in recent months.

The following note should be made.

That the babies hair and eyes are dark.

The girls hair is blond and has fair eyes.

In the next picture, Rebbitzin Chaya Mushka’s eyes and hair is dark again.

It is true, that the color of ones hair and eyes change of the years. However, it usually changes from light to dark, not dark then light and then dark again. Second of all, it does not change that fast. Third of all, one can always answer such things, and the Sha’ar of Tirutzim is never locked, however it has to be noted, that one can no longer say, that there is a seeming discrepancy between the various pictures.

If there is a discussion in regards to the authenticity of these pictures, don’t you think the reason is, because the supposed letters itself, are itself suspect?

As an aside, there are letters in regards to a number of other items, and those letters and items are clearly con items.