<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: E-Bike Crash Fuels Crown Heights Bike Lane Concerns	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://anash.org/e-bike-crash-fuels-crown-heights-bike-lane-concerns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://anash.org/e-bike-crash-fuels-crown-heights-bike-lane-concerns/</link>
	<description>Chabad News, Views, Inspiration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2025 18:00:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: NYC DOT Bike Lane Proposal Was DISAPPROVED		</title>
		<link>https://anash.org/e-bike-crash-fuels-crown-heights-bike-lane-concerns/#comment-64845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NYC DOT Bike Lane Proposal Was DISAPPROVED]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2025 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anash.org/?p=921131#comment-64845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here is the NYC DOT Bike Lane Proposal was DISAPPROVED -  https://www.nyc.gov/assets/brooklyncb9/downloads/pdf/2024/brooklyn-ave-kingston-ave-empire-blvd-winthrop-st-jun2024.pdf 
(See page 19 for summary)

Here is the official Brooklyn CB 9 Board Resolution Disapproving NYC DOT Bike Lane Proposal -  
https://www.nyc.gov/assets/brooklyncb9/downloads/pdf/2025/CB9ResolutionDOTKingstonBrooklynSchoolSafetyBikeLaneProject.pdf 

Keep in mind many board members will follow the suggestion of the Board Chair (Fred Baptiste), who himself was pushing for the NYC DOT&#039;s protected bike lanes.  NYC DOT chose Brooklyn and Kingston because that&#039;s where the bike lanes are North of Eastern Parkway.  https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/nyc-bike-map-2024.pdf 

Besides being dangerous blind spots, the protected bike lanes would have REMOVED one of the two traffic lanes on Brooklyn Ave, starting on Empire, south, or down to Rutland.  This would have unfortunately increased traffic and effect emergency response times.

Brooklyn &#038; Kingston Ave North of the Middle of Empire Blvd is under jurisdiction of District 35 City Councilmember Crystal Hudson. 
Brooklyn &#038; Kingston Ave South of the Middle Of Empire Blvd is under jurisdiction of District 40, City Councilmember Rita Joseph.

If it wasn&#039;t for CB 9 Board Member Benny Rosenberger&#039;s amendment, the community would be at risk of experiencing the same problems WIlliamsburg is experiencing now, with increased  pedestrian accidents, not to mention increased traffic times resulting from the removal of one of Brooklyn Ave&#039;s two traffic lanes ( South of Empire down to Rutland).

Comment by:
Jay Sorid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the NYC DOT Bike Lane Proposal was DISAPPROVED &#8211;  <a href="https://www.nyc.gov/assets/brooklyncb9/downloads/pdf/2024/brooklyn-ave-kingston-ave-empire-blvd-winthrop-st-jun2024.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.nyc.gov/assets/brooklyncb9/downloads/pdf/2024/brooklyn-ave-kingston-ave-empire-blvd-winthrop-st-jun2024.pdf</a><br />
(See page 19 for summary)</p>
<p>Here is the official Brooklyn CB 9 Board Resolution Disapproving NYC DOT Bike Lane Proposal &#8211;<br />
<a href="https://www.nyc.gov/assets/brooklyncb9/downloads/pdf/2025/CB9ResolutionDOTKingstonBrooklynSchoolSafetyBikeLaneProject.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.nyc.gov/assets/brooklyncb9/downloads/pdf/2025/CB9ResolutionDOTKingstonBrooklynSchoolSafetyBikeLaneProject.pdf</a> </p>
<p>Keep in mind many board members will follow the suggestion of the Board Chair (Fred Baptiste), who himself was pushing for the NYC DOT&#8217;s protected bike lanes.  NYC DOT chose Brooklyn and Kingston because that&#8217;s where the bike lanes are North of Eastern Parkway.  <a href="https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/nyc-bike-map-2024.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/nyc-bike-map-2024.pdf</a> </p>
<p>Besides being dangerous blind spots, the protected bike lanes would have REMOVED one of the two traffic lanes on Brooklyn Ave, starting on Empire, south, or down to Rutland.  This would have unfortunately increased traffic and effect emergency response times.</p>
<p>Brooklyn &amp; Kingston Ave North of the Middle of Empire Blvd is under jurisdiction of District 35 City Councilmember Crystal Hudson.<br />
Brooklyn &amp; Kingston Ave South of the Middle Of Empire Blvd is under jurisdiction of District 40, City Councilmember Rita Joseph.</p>
<p>If it wasn&#8217;t for CB 9 Board Member Benny Rosenberger&#8217;s amendment, the community would be at risk of experiencing the same problems WIlliamsburg is experiencing now, with increased  pedestrian accidents, not to mention increased traffic times resulting from the removal of one of Brooklyn Ave&#8217;s two traffic lanes ( South of Empire down to Rutland).</p>
<p>Comment by:<br />
Jay Sorid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jaywalking is Legal Now		</title>
		<link>https://anash.org/e-bike-crash-fuels-crown-heights-bike-lane-concerns/#comment-64839</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaywalking is Legal Now]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2025 05:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anash.org/?p=921131#comment-64839</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jaywalking is legal in NYC.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/29/nyregion/jaywalking-legal-law-nyc.html 

Double parking is necessary to drop off passengers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaywalking is legal in NYC.<br />
<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/29/nyregion/jaywalking-legal-law-nyc.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/29/nyregion/jaywalking-legal-law-nyc.html</a> </p>
<p>Double parking is necessary to drop off passengers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Can someone explain better what happened to the little girl?		</title>
		<link>https://anash.org/e-bike-crash-fuels-crown-heights-bike-lane-concerns/#comment-64828</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can someone explain better what happened to the little girl?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 19:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anash.org/?p=921131#comment-64828</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Double-parked&quot; means there were two rows of parked cars. &quot;Double-parking&quot; is illegal. (The fact that it is tolerated in connection with alternate-side parking does not mean it is legal; it is just tolerated temporarily so that the street sweepers can pass through.)

The bike lane being there does not mean that the row of cars next to the bike lane was &quot;double parked&quot;: they were legally parked.

So there must have then been a car illegally &quot;double-parked&quot; in the street, one lane even farther from the curb than the row of legally-parked cars lined up next to the bike lane.
So the little girl was standing pretty far out in the street, behind an illegally-double-parked car. 

So is it that the girl darted toward the curb b/c she was out in traffic and needed to go to the safety of the curb, and was hit by a speeding bike on her way to the curb?

If so, did anyone fault the bike-rider? My understanding is that pedestrians have the right of way, even when jaywalking, etc., crossing on a red light, etc.

If the police force were big enough to really enforce all the traffic laws more vigorously, bikes would eventally drive more responsibly.

To build so many bike lanes is premature, with no enforcement of driving laws for bikes. 

Allocate more resources to punishing bikes going too fast or doing other forms of aggressive, dangerous riding! THEN we can talk about making more bike lanes, &quot;protected&quot; or not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Double-parked&#8221; means there were two rows of parked cars. &#8220;Double-parking&#8221; is illegal. (The fact that it is tolerated in connection with alternate-side parking does not mean it is legal; it is just tolerated temporarily so that the street sweepers can pass through.)</p>
<p>The bike lane being there does not mean that the row of cars next to the bike lane was &#8220;double parked&#8221;: they were legally parked.</p>
<p>So there must have then been a car illegally &#8220;double-parked&#8221; in the street, one lane even farther from the curb than the row of legally-parked cars lined up next to the bike lane.<br />
So the little girl was standing pretty far out in the street, behind an illegally-double-parked car. </p>
<p>So is it that the girl darted toward the curb b/c she was out in traffic and needed to go to the safety of the curb, and was hit by a speeding bike on her way to the curb?</p>
<p>If so, did anyone fault the bike-rider? My understanding is that pedestrians have the right of way, even when jaywalking, etc., crossing on a red light, etc.</p>
<p>If the police force were big enough to really enforce all the traffic laws more vigorously, bikes would eventally drive more responsibly.</p>
<p>To build so many bike lanes is premature, with no enforcement of driving laws for bikes. </p>
<p>Allocate more resources to punishing bikes going too fast or doing other forms of aggressive, dangerous riding! THEN we can talk about making more bike lanes, &#8220;protected&#8221; or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thank Benny Rosenberger		</title>
		<link>https://anash.org/e-bike-crash-fuels-crown-heights-bike-lane-concerns/#comment-64820</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thank Benny Rosenberger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 06:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anash.org/?p=921131#comment-64820</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Feb, 25, 2025: CB 9 Board Member Benny Rosenberger swooped in to save the day and prevented the NYC DOT from getting the OK to create &quot;protected bike lanes&quot; in CB 9.  Mr. Rosenberger made an amended motion to remove the protected bike lanes and replace them with shared bike lanes.  Without the amendment, CB9 would have voted for protected bike lanes. 
You can see the CB 9 Transportation Chair plotz as he listens to CB 9 Board Member Benny Rosenberger destroy NYC DOT&#039;s plot for protected bike lanes in CB 9.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyoyEpqdoGQ&#038;t=6255s  -     
1 hr, 44 min, 16 sec mark

Comment by:
Jay Sorid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feb, 25, 2025: CB 9 Board Member Benny Rosenberger swooped in to save the day and prevented the NYC DOT from getting the OK to create &#8220;protected bike lanes&#8221; in CB 9.  Mr. Rosenberger made an amended motion to remove the protected bike lanes and replace them with shared bike lanes.  Without the amendment, CB9 would have voted for protected bike lanes.<br />
You can see the CB 9 Transportation Chair plotz as he listens to CB 9 Board Member Benny Rosenberger destroy NYC DOT&#8217;s plot for protected bike lanes in CB 9.<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyoyEpqdoGQ&#038;t=6255s" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyoyEpqdoGQ&#038;t=6255s</a>  &#8211;<br />
1 hr, 44 min, 16 sec mark</p>
<p>Comment by:<br />
Jay Sorid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
