<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Could This Be the Original Tomchei Tmimim in Lubavitch?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://anash.org/could-this-be-the-original-tomchei-tmimim-in-lubavitch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://anash.org/could-this-be-the-original-tomchei-tmimim-in-lubavitch/</link>
	<description>News, Views, Inspiration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 17:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mc		</title>
		<link>https://anash.org/could-this-be-the-original-tomchei-tmimim-in-lubavitch/#comment-71136</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 17:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anash.org/?p=988825#comment-71136</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One of these photos however clearly shows the kloister next to the chotzer and the building in front matches up perfectly with the Frierdeker Rebbe’s house and the one in back matches with the small zal or the Yeshiva offices]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of these photos however clearly shows the kloister next to the chotzer and the building in front matches up perfectly with the Frierdeker Rebbe’s house and the one in back matches with the small zal or the Yeshiva offices</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Correction		</title>
		<link>https://anash.org/could-this-be-the-original-tomchei-tmimim-in-lubavitch/#comment-66592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Correction]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 01:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anash.org/?p=988825#comment-66592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The tzemach tzedek was nistalek in 5626 (1866). What the article should have said was that the tzemach tzedek commanded his children and grandchildren that none of them could use his home for their personal use - even temporarily. Rather it should be used for the purpose of Torah study ect.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tzemach tzedek was nistalek in 5626 (1866). What the article should have said was that the tzemach tzedek commanded his children and grandchildren that none of them could use his home for their personal use &#8211; even temporarily. Rather it should be used for the purpose of Torah study ect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
